Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS
نویسندگان
چکیده
Studies of the effect of individual differences on usage of information systems have yielded mixed results. This study examines the effect of individual differences on the perceived relative advantage (a concept akin to perceived usefulness) of using Group Support Systems (GSS) over traditional face-to-face meetings. Specifically, the current field study investigates the effect of oral and writing communication apprehension, computer anxiety, and personal innovativeness on perceptions of relative advantage of a GSS. Results provide empirical support for the relationships explored and explain about 40% of variance in relative advantage of a GSS meeting vis-à-vis a traditional face-to-face meeting. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of golden section search method and imperialist competitive algorithm for optimization cut-off grade- case study: Mine No. 1 of Golgohar
Optimization of the exploitation operation is one of the most important issues facing the mining engineers. Since several technical and economic parameters depend on the cut-off grade, optimization of this parameter is of particular importance. The aim of this optimization is to maximize the net present value (NPV). Since the objective function of this problem is non-linear, three methods can b...
متن کاملCase and Field Studies of Group Support Systems: An Empirical Assessment
This paper presents the results of 38 case and field studies from 57 published papers spanning two decades of group support systems (GSS) research. It organizes the methodology and results of these studies into a four-factor framework consisting of contextual factors, intervening factors, adaptation factors, and outcome factors. The results show that the modal outcome for a GSS in field setting...
متن کاملAssociation of hyperhomocysteinemia with coronary artery disease in southern Iran
Dear Editor, In response to the criticisms regarding the article entitled; “association of hyperhomocysteinemia with coronary artery disease in Southern Iran”, published in Iran J Med Sci,1 we still believe the methodology used in this study was a case control design as the cases where chosen on the basis of outcome (coronary artery disease) and the controls were individuals without the disease...
متن کاملA Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Consensus and Satisfaction Levels Within and Between the U.S. and Mexico
Relatively few studies have considered cultural dimensions in their analysis of Group Support Systems (GSS) and even fewer have employed empirical data to test their hypotheses. A cross-culturalfleld experiment was used to measure the effects of “‘national culture” (U.S. andMexican) upon group consensus levels and individual satisfaction levels in GSS environments and non-G%’ environments. Expe...
متن کاملComparison on efficacy of family planning education based on individual education vs health system education
Family planning is programming about future of reproductive reproduction. The main aim of this research was to compare the efficacy of family planning education by individual education in residential place and by health system education. In This quazi-experimental study, 120 married women who did not use any contraceptive for purpose of family planning, don’t have intend to be pregnant, w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Decision Support Systems
دوره 32 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002